Subject	They will be mostly a city driver, but I thought I should
Posted by	ZiNnYc on December 19, 2009 at 10:58 AM
	This message has been viewed 79 times.
In Reply To	Mostly city driving? posted by vorpalZ on December 19, 2009 at 09:38 AM
Message	be shying away from WS and non "winter performance" tires? Reason I say so is because the WS rated tires (studless ice and snow) would burn out exponentially faster on dry cold, as they are made for snow/ice conditions. I would imagine they really arent meant for seeing pavement. NYC Sanitation is extremely capable, and if its 2 inches or 10 inches, that snow is gone pretty damn quick. Im more geared towards cold pavement with some slush on the ground and occasional ice/snow. Also, I was comparing the 25s to the 60s, which are the Blizzak flagship performance snow tires, not the 22s. This is my first winter whipping around TT, so I want to be safe on cold dry highways for some spirited driving.
Follow Ups	Winter tire suggestions? - ZiNnYc 01:34:10 12/19/09 i had blizzaks on my n/a for 3 winters...... - eazyez 08:47:42 12/19/09 Blizzaks and a Sand Tube - BobbyT 08:57:00 12/19/09 Mostly city driving? - vorpalZ 09:38:04 12/19/09 They will be mostly a city driver, but I thought I should - ZiNnYc 10:58:30 12/19/09 Sounds like the LM-22's will work well then, - vorpalZ 16:21:06 12/19/09 Just starting my second winter on my Gislaved's. - jschrauwen 09:46:24 12/19/09 I run Nokian WR's on my Legacy and Blizzak LM-25's on my - zgene4 13:07:05 12/19/09 I'm running Blizzak LM-60s on the Bimmer. So far they've - Inzane 16:27:15 12/19/09 I have run Dunlop Wintersport M3's and D3's on my S4 - Only1Z 18:29:59 12/19/09 I have the Blizzak LM-22 on my Z - TTFairladyZ 18:38:59 12/19/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.